|
|
|
|
Mary Magdalene
The words in brackets are missing from the scroll and have been guessed at. But no matter for it seems that Jesus kissed her somewhere that made the disciples jealous. It is important to note that there is no mention of Mary Magdalene's being favoured in this way in the synoptic Gospels.
Mary Magdalene was not a prostitute but was described in Mark 16:9 and Luke 8:2 as a woman "out of whom went seven devils". This means that she was under the authority of 'Satan' like 'the widow'. Judas Iscariot was 'Demon 7' the name for him as a member of the zealot party. As the chief scribe, he had the position once held by Gabriel, which included authority over celibate women before and after marriage. Her TITLE was Mary [Miriam] and this was NOT her name, this included the mother of Jesus. They took this title from the wife of Moses because they had been given a form a ministry, that of a prophetess, taking part in liturgies of orders like those of the Therapeutae. The Magdalene was also a title and came from the prophet Micah and is a corruption of the Jewish phrase Migdal-Eder - Watchtower of the Flock.
So why was Mary Magdalene Sainted? She has been mentioned 10 times in the new testament. Mostly in the company of other women who haven't been sainted. It is said that she was sainted because she was the first to witness the risen Christ. QUESTION Why is this important event in her life not featured anywhere in this Church at Rennes le Chateau dedicated to SAINT Marie-Madeleine? Why, if there is nothing to this story, did the Abbé Sauniere, a Catholic priest, choose not to feature the very reason why Mary Magdalene has been sainted in any of the iconography of his church? Yet featured two instances of Mary of Bethany being intimate with Jesus?
*************************
First thing that strikes you is that we are not told whose wedding this is but not only have Jesus and the disciples been invited but also Mary mother of Jesus. The second question is what spiritual significance does this have? Turning water into wine? The significance was that it was his first miracle. Firstly we must understand that when the Gospels were first written they would only have been written for trained eyes schooled with understanding. they were never envisaged for inclusion into a book written for everyone. All religious writing was done in the form of a reference to the scriptures. The meaning of the inclusion of this apparant 'party trick' is on another level of meaning called a 'Pesher'. Jesus is breaking with tradition for only celibates (this would have included Jesus at this point) could receive communion. In this apparant miracle he was allowing the 'unclean' persons (Gentiles) to receive communion. But whose wedding was this? There is nothing sinister about us not being told because it would have been irrelevant to the pesher and the assumption is clear to those with understanding. Mary mother of Jesus was part of the story and so was included in the text. When Essene marriage rules are brought together it is clear that this was in fact ONE of the marriages of Jesus to Mary Magdalene at Cana (Ain Feshkha) conducted under Hellenist rules. Three marriages are required, the wedding at Cana is in fact merely a betrothal but is a little more than just an engagement. The phrase 'my time has not yet come' means that this was the feast that preceded the ceremony. We actually can make a very good guess of the date of this wedding, it is June 6th 30CE. It occurred in the evening on the same day that Jesus was in the corn fields with the disciples which is depicted in parchment one. We know this from a correlation between the four Gospels (Mark 2, Luke 6 and John 2) and a deep understanding of the strict rules surrounding Essene marriage from the Temple Scrolls worked out from the Sabbatical year. The transcripts of the two Priory Of Sion parchments, Jesus in the corn fields and the anointment of the feet of Jesus by Mary Magdalene, signify a quite definite allusion to the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. Clearly the authors of these two parchments knew something.
Personally I do not have a problem with Jesus being married but it seems that people are more prepared to have Jesus born of a virgin, walk on water and turn water into wine than to have him perform the normal functions of an earthly bound heterosexual male.
Note
Stained glass window depicting Mary of Bethany anointing the feet of Jesus. This story is depicted in the large Shepherdess parchment text. It has been assumed that Mary of Bethany is Mary Magdalene although this has been by no means accepted by all scholars of theology. *********************************************************************************The Village of Brenac
Here is painting by unknown artist that used to feature in Brenac church of a penitent Mary Magdalene kneeling and praying to another rugged cross, accompanied by scroll and skull and spikenard vessel (or perhaps a vessel containing ashes). The hills in the background are particularly distinctive.
Now look at thisAs the game goes - Say what you see!
Left to rightA chateau - Rennes le Chateau?In front of this on the same ridge, a tower with wall to the right? - La tour Magdala?An Arch in the background? - Arques?Blue and white conical hill behind the flat ridge but in front of the Arch? - Cardou?A line drawn on a map that leaves Rennes le Chateau to the left, Arques in the middle and Cardou to the right extends to the west through Brenac Church. In other words this frieze under the altar in Saunière's church of Saint Marie Madeleine could be a theoretical view from a cave that is situated at Brenac showing a Golden Dawn emerging from behind the Arch.It is worth noting that, despite the distance (just under 10km), Brenac church can be clearly seen from Rennes le Chateau and vice versa. We're told that Saunière made many visits to this church and after consulting a retired priest from there apparantly turned his attention to Perillos to the east of Rennes near to Perpignan. However it is worth noting that this line drawn from Brenac church to Arques is at an angle of 23.5 degrees from due east i.e. The tilt angle of the earth.Brenac is a village just off the road from Quillan to Montsegur. The village was formerly known as Bernacum and is at the foot of the plate of Nebias which encompasses the commune of hamlets comprising of Fauruc, Lasserre, Monsec and Prax. The name Brenac is probably of Gallo-Roman origins. The Chapter of Narbonne holds the title deeds to it in the 9th century and there is mention of the village, as Bernacum, in 870, in the cartulary of St Just. The Chapter of Narbonne (St Just) then equipped the place as a stronghold and this was done by royal approval. Its history dates back to prehistoric times, as several
remains continue to testify. In the 11th century, the church was built and the
old remains of this church are visible in the current church, which has since
then been altered numerous times. The village suffered during the Cathar
crusade, as well as the religious wars that occurred in the 16th century. The
chronicle states that virtually everything had to be rebuilt. The church also
had to be repaired. It would suffer again during the French Revolution, but
unlike others in the area, was not destroyed. There was a former priest of Brenac called Capel who was curé in 1793. We know that the priest of Rennes-le-Château, Bigou, went to Spain to flee the French Revolution, there is some speculation that the priest of Brenac went with him? In the early 19th century, the church was in a sorry state.
In 1809, Mgr. de Laporte, bishop of Carcassonne, worried about the maintenance
of the building. However it would be 1837 before any work was carried out. An entry
porch was added and to the left and right, two side chapels were created. The church is under the protection of St Julien and St
Basilisse, both saints that lived in the 4th century and were martyrs in
Antioch. In the county of the Razès we find the churches of Especel, Magrie and
Villar-Saint-Andre also under their patronage. In Brenac, the celebrations in
their honour occur on January 19, the day of St Marius, but before, it was the
feast of St Germanique. The following day, January 20, masses were said for the
dead. Saunière is reported to have consulted Courtade before turning his attention to Perillos. Last but not least it is worth a mention that at the
beginning of the 17th century there was yet another enigmatic figure, Polycarpe
de la Rivière, who showed a more than normal interest in the history of Brenac.
Too strong an interest, it seems, as his work on the history was forbidden by
the Church authorities.
******************
Careful close scrutiny of the Magdalene frieze under the altar reveals some interesting hypotheses. One of the things that is usually overlooked is the twin pillars either side of The Magdalene that symbolically hold up the Arch and the altar, but remembering the original story of how Saunière supposedly found his parchments in a cracked pillar. What is pretty clear is that no cracked pillars have been found so perhaps the story is allegorical. For indeed the story of a weeping virgin in front of a cracked pillar reading from a book has significant meaning in masonic circles and indeed the black and white chequered flooring of the church and the two pillars seems to reinforce this view. Remember of course that underneath this frieze there used to be the phrase (found also on the parchment):JÉSU . MEDÈLA . VULNÉRUM + SPES . UNA . PŒNITENTIUMPER . MAGDALÀNÆ . LACRYMAS + PECCATA . NOSTRA . DILUAS"Jesus, cures wounds + hope at the same time pays the penalty,by Magdalene's tears + dilute our errors."Note: For some reason this phrase under the altar was destroyed by a vandal in the 1970s, perhaps this interpretation was the reason why.
On the left is the masonic depiction of the weeping virgin (Virgo) holding the sprig of acacia and chalice and reading from an open book, whilst at her back stands father time teasing out the ringlets of her hair. At her feet is the broken pillar of Solomon's Temple."Masonry still retains among its emblems one of a woman
weeping over a broken column, holding in her hand a branch of acacia, myrtle, or
tamarisk, while Time, we are told, stands behind her combing out the ringlets of
her hair. We need not repeat the vapid and trivial explanation... given, of this
representation of
Isis,
weeping at Byblos, over the column torn from the palace of the King, that
contained the body of Osiris, while Horus, the God of Time, pours ambrosia on
her hair."
|