|
| |
Here are the letters and arguments usually put forward as
proof of de Chèrisey's confession.
Firstly this written in English.
| I received your letter and I write at once at Maison
JULLIARD like with Mister de SEDE, to protest against the use without
authorization, of the two parchments of your manufacture and deposited
with my study, this in the work: The GOLD OF RENNES. Please accept, Dear
Sir, with the insurance of my devoted feelings |
| Still not of answer my letter of the 17 January sum of
money has. I must be operated six days. Thus only one word to warn you
that Gerald of Sède is in possession of the case of files of the Priory of
Sion stolen to the 37, street Saint Lazare and with his contents prepare a
book against us. It is in possession of the file of George Monti, as well
as photocopy of your contract with Rene Descadeillas or you 65% of the
rights for the work: Rennes and its last Lords. Worse still, in this case
was your (original) manuscript of Circuit! What can one make? To
acknowledge before the publication which the work CIRCUIT isn't me Want
you me to give an answer?
On the origin of the Priory of Sion, my research recoups a hold
on them, all the publications of Philippe Toscan come from one [who] is
delirious under the effect of drug, the truth according to the files of
the Order held by my uncle Saint Hillier with the Chateau de Lys, it is on
September 19, 1736, which François d' Hautpoul and Jean Paul de Negre
founder of the Priory of Sion, the 2nd Grand Maitre is well Andre Hercules
de Rosset (Limoux/Stenay). The continuation does not have any error:
Charles and Maximilien of Lorraine, finally after the revolution; Nodier,
Hugo, Debussy (with Monti) and Cocteau. I received threatening letter of
insane, his name Roger Dagobert, he declares [to be] the descendant of
general Dagobert, and Dagobert Saint, therefore heir legitimate to the
gold mines that are in your grounds of ROCK NEGRE has Rennes, moreover
pretender to the throne of France. Soon
Note - At the moment here the is the mail and still a letter of
this [ancestor] of Dagobert which passes has the dustbin. He pretend now
to link his name and quotes like [an] owner of the treasure of Rennes
in one of the parchments (that of my manufacture) the human
silly thing does not have limit. Example: All the acts of Hautpoul,
included that of Blanche de Castille and that until 1337 were carried out
on order of the king Louis XIV by Charles Rene d' Hozier de Serigny,
judges weapons and certificate gives on 30 April 1781. made reproduction
at Montpellier in 1911 to 1913 |
Here Philippe de Cherisey specifically states that he
fabricated the Dagobert parchment. He does not say he fabricated the Shepherdess
parchment and why would de Cherisey write his confession in English?
Here is a copy from Circuit. Is this the one of the documents that
Gerard de Sède had that de Chérisey speaks about above?
Here are two sheets from Philippe de Chèrisey's Novel CIRCUIT
in the second sheet he says
|
Under the white horse with Saint Sulpice. Have you MARIE
genius. It is most famous of the secret alphabets, that which one obtains
on a chess-board by the jump of the rider. One leaves the result
which consists, being given a solitary rider, to make him leap all the
boxes of the play sounds pass by again a souls time by the nêre box.
Unfortunately neither me, nor let us know you the result and when well
even it is completed, one counts a contained solutions between which one
would need many days, perhaps months
MADELEINE cried about it |
De Cherisey is referring this Delacroix's painting in Saint Sulpice
Eugène Delacroix. Heliodorus Driven from the Temple.
1854-1861
de Chèrisey also says that the blue apples go onto the altar at Saint Sulpice,
they don't they never have done but they do at
Rennes le Chateau at midday on 17th January. Why is he, the supposed author,
getting this wrong again.
Why, if Philippe de Cherisey wrote the Shepherdess parchment, is he alluding to
a painting from a time when the French were using a 26 letter alphabet and going
to a great deal of trouble using a 25 letter alphabet for the Vigenere code?
Why did he feel the need to encrypt it using a 25 letter code when it wasn't
necessary to do so?
You are reminded that he got the decryption completely wrong as a result of
using a 26 letter decryption table to decrypt a code he supposedly encrypted
using a 25 letter table?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Here's another so-called confession by De Chèrisey
29 January 1974
P.S. Do you know that the famous manuscripts supposedly discovered by the Abbé
Saunière were composed in 1965? And that I took
responsibility for being the author?
Yours sincerely
Philippe de Chérisey.
This was in a letter to Pierre Jarnac who incidentally believes that
de Chèrisey wasn't the author.
De Chèrisey would have taken responsibility for writing the parchments in order
to discredit Gerard de Sède who somehow had possession of the case of files of
the Priory of Sion stolen from 37, Rue Saint Lazare.
At this time I cannot positively say that the parchments weren't composed in
1965 but I can positively say that they were not made by de Chèrisey, he merely
took responsibility for making them.
  |
